Why Learning Is the Key to Optimization
The transformation of our industry is underway, with many artificial intelligence (AI) drug discovery companies claiming to offer unprecedented speed and efficiency. But delivering on this promise has an important prerequisite.
Before AI can optimize drug candidates, it must first learn — not just from data, but from structured experimentation, human expertise, and real-world feedback.
Without high-quality learning, AI is incapable of performing as expected; it’s just an algorithm making educated guesses. To make optimization more meaningful, we need something different.
We need AI models that truly represent biological systems.
This principle is a cornerstone of Logica’s AI-powered drug discovery approach. It’s also the foundation of successful drug R&D.
Optimization Without Learning
The biopharma industry continues to struggle with low R&D productivity, where rising costs and high attrition rates remain the norm despite significant technological advances.1 Traditionally, drug discovery researchers used a good bit of trial and error. They might have applied high-throughput screening to thousands of molecules in hopes of finding a hit. Thanks to AI, this process has dramatically accelerated, though it’s certainly not infallible:
- AI is only as effective as the data it’s trained on
- Traditional machine learning models find patterns in large datasets and extrapolate which chemical structures are most promising; but if they’re trained on incomplete or biased datasets, AI may reinforce preexisting errors and predict success based on misleading correlations, as opposed to actual biological mechanisms2
- Predictions without experimental validation can lead to false positives
- When AI relies too heavily on theoretical modeling without wet lab confirmation of its predictions, predictive models can suggest molecules that seem viable on paper yet fail in real-world testing; this disconnect between in silico prediction and biological reality contributes to the high attrition rates still seen across the industry3
- If AI learns only from positive data, it misses insights from failures
- One of the most overlooked issues in AI-driven drug discovery is the bias toward successful compounds. The insights hiding in negative data can be priceless. A drug candidate that fails due to toxicity, instability, or poor bioavailability offers just as much information — likely more — than a successful one2
Consider this: A machine learning model trained only on successful drugs would have no understanding of why others failed. This could lead to missed safety signals, off-target effects, or poor pharmacokinetics.
This is where Logica’s approach stands apart from the crowd. Our AI continuously learns from experimental successes AND failures. When you add human expertise, real-world experimental feedback, and continuous AI refinement, it’s clear how Logica® uses knowledge-guided optimization, not just predictions.
Learning Is the Key to Effective AI Optimization
AI in drug discovery isn’t about automating success. Rather, it’s about refining our knowledge to drive superior decisions. Logica’s LEARN phase ensures that before any compound is optimized, it undergoes rigorous data-informed learning.
1. Generating High-Quality AI Training Data (It’s a Big Deal)
Logica integrates multiple data sources — both experimental and literature-based — to train AI models on what works, what fails, and why. This includes data from:
- DNA-encoded library (DEL) screening — mapping chemical interactions across billions of compounds
- High-throughput screening (HTS) — rapidly testing compound libraries for activity
- Virtual screening — predicting molecular interactions in silico before real-world validation
- Scientific literature — supplementing in-house data with known pharmacological insights and published results
The incorporation of proprietary and published data — with positive and negative outcomes — allows Logica to train AI models that reflect real biological behavior. Refining predictions iteratively to improve reliability and reduce false positives ensures that learning is rooted in scientific evidence, not just statistical patterns.2
2. Casting a Wider Net to Find Meaningful Patterns in the Data
Traditional drug discovery methods focus on compounds that hit the target. Logica, on the other hand, casts a wider net for more informative data earlier in the process:
- Explores a broader chemical space — hits, misses, and everything in between
- Refines predictions with lab feedback — continuous learning loop
- Surfaces novel opportunities — AI guides scientists toward new therapeutic angles
Our “lab-in-the-loop” approach is how we ensure that AI-driven models continuously adapt to new findings. This has a two-pronged benefit: 1) less wasted time, and 2) an increased likelihood of finding viable drug candidates.4
3. Making the Leap From Hits to High-Confidence Leads
Once AI understands biological interactions — and not before — optimization can begin. But optimizing the wrong compound is worse than starting over. Possibly, far worse. While AI has shown remarkable promise in increasing early-phase success rates, its true impact hinges on refining the right molecules from the start.5
Logica’s AI refines lead candidates before full-scale development by:
- Prioritizing molecules with better pharmacokinetics (PK), selectivity, and safety
- Iterating on chemical structures to improve viability
- Using experimental data to adjust AI models
Through this process, Logica doesn’t just find molecules; it builds confidence in the BEST molecules. This ensures fewer failures downstream and a more efficient candidate progression process.
AI + Human Expertise = The Way of the Future
AI is a potent tool with enormous potential for AI drug discovery companies and their partners — when and ONLY when it’s paired with structured, validated knowledge. Scientific expertise and experimental validation are needed to guide AI-driven discovery forward on the best possible path: where predictions are grounded in biological reality. Integrating AI with experimental data allows Logica to enhance both speed and precision in drug discovery. This accelerates timelines while reducing risks. One without the other just won’t do.
This iterative learning process using real-world feedback is a true game-changer. But there’s an additional benefit available: through Logica’s risk-sharing model, clients gain access to cutting-edge AI and human expertise while also benefiting from a de-risked discovery approach that’s designed to maximize success.
What’s Next for AI Drug Discovery?
AI’s potential in drug discovery is far from just theoretical — it’s happening right now. AI models are continuously improving, and those who invest in learning-first strategies will be the ones who lead the next wave of medical breakthroughs.
Historically, drug discovery programs have suffered long timelines and high attrition, with R&D efficiency declining over time despite technological advances.⁶ Today, the integration of AI with iterative learning offers a turning point: not just a new tool, but a fundamentally new way of doing drug discovery.
Want to see how Logica turns better learning into better optimization?
Download the full white paper.
References
1 Schuhmacher, A., Hinder, M., von Stegman und Stein, A., et al. Analysis of pharma R&D productivity – a new perspective needed. Drug Discovery Today. Published 2023 October.
2 Zielinski, A. (2021). AI and the future of pharmaceutical research. ArXiv. Published 2021 June 25 (preprint).
3 Kola, I., and Landis, J. Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery. Published 2004 August 1.
4 Logica. Redefining Drug Discovery With AI Integration. Logica.ai. Published 2024 November.
5 Jayatunga, M.K.P., Ayers, M., Bruens, L., et al. How successful are AI-discovered drugs in clinical trials? A first analysis and emerging lessons. Drug Discovery Today. Published 2024 June.
6 Prentis, R.A., Lis, Y., and Walker, S.R. Pharmaceutical innovation by the seven UK-owned pharmaceutical companies (1964-1985). British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. Published 1988 March.